Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftless2

The Indians left significant constructions in the four corners area, structures which abased on sophisticated astronomical knowledge. Theer were about a thousand years ago, a large concentration of people in the vicintiy of St.Louis based on agriculture. Such things did not last ,but they existed at one time or another. Most of the Indian nations east of the Mississippi depended on the cultivation of corn, and the white found huge fields on either side the the Ohio. This was supplemented by hunting, and it is speculated that the reason why the population did not grow was a lack of meat animals and a subsequent lack of protein, so that when an area did grow, it soon reached a limit. The English found a significant population in the Chesapeake area, and organized un the Powhatten into a confederacy.
The first settlers existed by trading with the Indians for their corn surplus, but as John Smith tells us, because the Stllers ran out of food, they had to resort to raiding the indians for what they would not trade.


47 posted on 11/23/2012 7:55:39 AM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS
Yes, but how much is a "significant population?" I've read a number of articles about the Indian population of the country above the Rio Grande. Some revisionist, i.e.leftist historians, for obvious purposes try to claim the population numbered as much as 20 million. They have absolutely no proof for wild estimates like that. The fact is if there were definite proof of larger populations than a few million, there would have been plenty of historical facts even if the Indians had no written language. They check things like burial places and evidences of organized communities i.e. towns and cities which would allow for larger numbers. They simply haven't found any.

Below the Rio Grande was different because the Mayans and the Aztecs had actual cities and other organized manifestations of cultures with sizable populations. Not true in America above Mexico.

48 posted on 11/23/2012 8:09:43 AM PST by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: RobbyS; driftless2
The English found a significant population in the Chesapeake area, and organized un the Powhatten into a confederacy.

There were also plentiful Leni Lenape (Delaware) indians in the Philadelphia-Delaware settlements. Philadelphia's map is full of Indian names, such as Conshohocken, Wissahickon, Moyamensing, Shackamaxon, etc.

52 posted on 11/23/2012 10:16:14 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("Not only no, but HELL NO we will NOT moderate our stance."-- Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson