Posted on 11/22/2012 9:15:29 AM PST by Bayard
The timing is a gift to us as we celebrate Thanksgiving in our nation this week. This year, we get to celebrate the lives of 5% more Americans.
The data was just released this week because it takes a few years to compile. I have said many times that I was curious to see what the abortion rate did in 2009, after the most pro-abortion president in the history of our nation was elected to office. The reason I wondered this wasnt obvious, but ironic.
You see, as I have reported before, President Obama has actually been one of the best things to happen to the pro-life movement. Despite his intentions to bring a culture of choice, his dramatic approach to abortion has caused a sleeping church to wake up and stretch its muscles of both prayer and activism to increase a culture of LIFE. The result has been myriad new laws restricting abortionunder his reign as president. (Excerpt LifeSiteNews.com)
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
What makes you say that being willing to abort your baby is genetic? Wouldn’t it be just as likely environmental?
In addition to your comments, one of the posters at the Lifesite link pointed out that teenagers may be forgoing sex in larger numbers because of the high incidence of STD's. They have reached epidemic proportions among the young.
The reason I don't think environmental factors have a large impact on abortion is that despite a strong, over-the-top campaign to promote abortion ongoing since before Roe v. Wade, the abortion industry has been losing ground for years. If the incidence of abortion were strictly due to environmental factors, every woman of childbearing age would be using it as birth control, because it has been promoted that strongly. In reality, few do. (In comparison: recycling has also been promoted for decades, and few people even question the practice.)
The decision to have an abortion takes place long before an "unwanted" pregnancy occurs. Once that decision is made, the behavior that leads to an abortion follows. From that fact, we can extrapolate that only women with certain personality traits would make the decision to engage in that kind of behavior. Furthermore, the maternal instinct is extremely strong; only a woman whose willpower is strong enough to overcome that instinct is able to have an abortion. Those who have abortions do not have as many live children as other women, both because of personality, and because physical damage resulting from abortion decreases the likelihood of carrying a child to term. Because personality traits and the ability to suppress the maternal instinct are controlled genetically, the genes involved are being weeded out of the population.
Yes, that is true. The trend rather supports my hypothesis that those who use abortion as birth control are effectively removing certain genetic characteristics from the population.
In addition to your comments, one of the posters at the Lifesite link pointed out that teenagers may be forgoing sex in larger numbers because of the high incidence of STD's. They have reached epidemic proportions among the young.
I think we can thank Planned Parenthood for much of that. By encouraging irresponsible behavior for the last few decades, they've promoted the circumstances where STDs spread. Teens who don't take precautions against pregnancy certainly aren't protecting themselves against STDs.
Indeed, although PP has gotten a big assist from popular music, movies, TV, and the ongoing "pornification" of the culture in general. The media are awash in depictions of and incitements to debauched living.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.