Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teflon9

Living standards are much higher than they were in the ‘50s and ‘60s—and global markets have a lot to do with that.


52 posted on 11/22/2012 9:01:01 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

We also didn’t need to buy so much stuff to be considered to have a high standard of living.....there weren’t many electronic gadgets, food wasn’t processed, it was usually made from scratch, and people didn’t eat out as much, for many in urban areas, a car wasn’t even a necessity.


55 posted on 11/22/2012 9:03:31 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker

Really? So that’s why some unskilled nebbish was still able to buy a home, a new car, and put a kid through college, often without his wife having to go to work? Just because we have better gadgets now than 50 years ago does NOT mean living standards are better.


58 posted on 11/22/2012 9:05:35 AM PST by teflon9 (Political campaigns should follow Johnny Mercer's advice--Accentuate the positive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker

Really? So that’s why some unskilled nebbish was still able to buy a home, a new car, and put a kid through college, often without his wife having to go to work? Just because we have better gadgets now than 50 years ago does NOT mean living standards are better.


59 posted on 11/22/2012 9:05:41 AM PST by teflon9 (Political campaigns should follow Johnny Mercer's advice--Accentuate the positive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson