[Uncle Chip]

If he were the dangerous individual you make him out to be, why didn't the police arrest him for reckless endangerment for the negligent discharge of his firearm inside this 'safe middleclass neighborhood'?

Because he didn't shoot at a moving target charging at him which would have likely sent the bullet astray thus recklessly endangering the neighborhood.

Instead he shot down at a relatively stationary target a foot away from his feet that was barking at him -- a much safer and guaranteed shot.

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

Instead he shot down at a relatively stationary target a foot away from his feet that was barking at him -- a much safer and guaranteed shot.

Or, the shooting was justified.

Instead he shot down at a relatively stationary target a foot away from his feet that was barking at him -- a much safer and guaranteed shot.

You keep writing this without a single cite to support this assertion. Please show where the dogs stopped a foot short of Gross and stood there barking at him.

Just because you're a terrible shot who couldn't hit a charging dog doesn't everyone shares your shortcomings. For all we know, Gross was a crack shot.

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

Instead he shot down at a relatively stationary target a foot away from his feet that was barking at him -- a much safer and guaranteed shot.

Or, because in the eyes of the police, the shooting was justified.

Because he didn't shoot at a moving target charging at him which would have likely sent the bullet astray thus recklessly endangering the neighborhood.

You keep writing this without a single cite to support this assertion. Please show where the dogs stopped a foot short of Gross and stood there barking at him.

Just because you're a terrible shot who couldn't hit a charging dog doesn't everyone shares your shortcomings. For all we know, Gross was a crack shot.