Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

Obviously no prophecy scholar is infallible, and I may differ with all of them on certain certain things.

The point remains that Reagan’s critique of the Muslim Antichrist theory is a very good one. I also posted a link quoting others such as Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum and Dr. Mark Hitchcock who give reasons why they too reject the Muslim Antichrist theory.

Here again are the links, for anyone interested to read point-by-point critiques of the Muslim Antichrist theory:

An Evaluation of the Muslim Antichrist Theory
by Dr. David R. Reagan
http://www.pre-trib.org/data/pdf/Reagan-AnEvaluationoftheMus.pdf

Will the Antichrist be a Muslim? No.
(This article quotes Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum and Dr. Mark Hitchcock.)
http://www.lamblion.com/files/publications/blog/blog_Will-The-Antichrist-Be-A-Muslim-No.pdf


21 posted on 11/21/2012 4:02:25 PM PST by onthelookout777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: onthelookout777

Here is an early response by Richardson:

http://archives.joelstrumpet.com/?p=1690

A Response to Dr. David Reagan By Joel Richardson
January 11, 2009 in Updates


23 posted on 11/21/2012 4:55:05 PM PST by Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson