Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pearls Before Swine

Not to mention there used to be even more tax shelters and deductions. The 86 tax law really pruned those. Everyone played extensive tax games.

Krugman claimed that the rich paid something like 70% after all was said and done, and I really doubt it.


9 posted on 11/20/2012 5:28:03 PM PST by drbuzzard (All animals are created equal, but some are more equal than others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: drbuzzard
Not to mention there used to be even more tax shelters and deductions. The 86 tax law really pruned those.

Pruned? It cut the hell out of it. That is why so many Country Clubs went out of business. You could not write the yearly dues and fees off as customer entertainment expense anymore. Same thing with company cars or other perks for executives. They have to be reported now as 'imputed income.' Hell, I had to pay imputed income on a life insurance policy the company paid for me! Figure that. I never saw a penny of it and had to pay tax on it anyway.

There was a lot that changed back in 86 --- most for the better, I might add, but Krugman has his head up his butt if he thinks it was a better world back then tax wise.

Throw those same kind of rates in today without the same deducts and exemptions, and this economy would shut down damn near immediately.

Hell, I remember writing off interest on my car loans and credit cards on my meager tax return. After '86, you could not do that anymore. Does Krugman want to allow that again or does he want to 'punish the middle class?'

27 posted on 11/20/2012 7:14:57 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson