[Longbow1969]

Point 1: We can leverage our power (as conservatives first and Republicans second) to regain the presidency, at least for a while longer. To do so, we must concentrate our efforts at winning the Euro vote to our side, as increasing numbers of Euro-Americans (even liberal ones), become openly hostile to national policies which seem to have jettisoned our cultural heritage in favor of an onslaught of non-Euro newcomers. If this sounds like “group identity politics”, well, that’s what it is. Every OTHER ethnic/racial group in America sees themselves _as_ a group. American Euros face two choices: keep pretending this reality doesn’t affect us (and keep on losing), or understand that reality for what it is, adopt to it (within reason), and perhaps turn our chances around, if by this point they can even be turned around.

More and more people are going to come to this conclusion. To even discuss things like this usually results in charges of "white nationalism". Unfortunately, the left has been playing this game with every single other racial group already, and because of that have set themselves up to dominate electorally for a very long time. The Republicans are already on a glide path to win a bigger and bigger share of the white vote going forward, the problem is we are not winning enough fast enough to offset the minorities voting in ever bigger numbers for Democrats. Maximizing the "Euro" vote is an option. I can understand the argument for why it may be necessary. But know this, if you make that case you are going to be called a racist. The left establishment is aware of our predicament and the media and entertainment industry will vilify anyone, and I do mean ANYONE, who tries to win over the white vote the way Democrats win over the minority vote.

The problem with this option is, ultimately, how do you make this case to the "Euro" audience (in order to maximize their vote) without attracting the lunatic fringe, genuine haters, true racists, etc. We really don't want a bunch of Aryan Nations types make inroads in the conservative movement.

[Road Glide]

“The problem with this option is, ultimately, how do you make this case to the “Euro” audience (in order to maximize their vote) without attracting the lunatic fringe, genuine haters, true racists, etc. We really don’t want a bunch of Aryan Nations types make inroads in the conservative movement.”

I’ll respond by asking, how do the Republicans make their case in states like Mississippi or Alabama RIGHT NOW?

Romney got 89% of “the Euro vote” in Mississippi, and he received 84% of their vote in Alabama, if I recall correctly.

And in both those states, there are “minority populations” that amount to something like 35% of the population or more. But the Pubbies win anyway, and they win easily.

Obviously, the party down there is doing something right. You may call them “racis’”, you may call them whatever you wish. But they are winning.

“Ultimately”, we must “make the case” to the Euros elsewhere the same way that it has been made to those of Dixie.

We don’t need overwhelming numbers (yet). What we DO need is a percentage increase from, say, 59% to 65% , especially in those critical states where it can make a difference. And in those very “critical states”, the populations are heavily Euro (unlike states like California, New Mexico, Illinois, New York, which in all likelihood will never vote for a Republican presidential candidate again).

Whatever is being done in the deep south right now WORKS.
Let’s make it work elsewhere for us.