No. MALE property owners. That's the way the Constitution was written.
The way the Constitution was written states control voting rights. Using that fact, folks interested in broadening the franchise were able to do it a state at a time.
So you are saying that only male property owners should get to vote on their futures?
Interesting theory.
I own quite a bit of property and a business. I am also a conservative. I am also a woman. And I know plenty of women in the same situation.
So I should have no voice? I guess no male property owners voted for O?
I am more in favor of voter id, literacy tests and maybe drug testing (/jk) to solve this dilemma.
Like I said, interesting theory.