Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
Then we're screwed, because what I saw of the Tea Party in 2012 was pretty weak.

2012 wasn't a Tea Party campaign. It was a Romney campaign. One that chose to shut out the voice of the tea party. 2014 will be another Tea Party election and if we work hard and succeed in controlling the presidential nomination, 2016 will also be a tea party campaign. Palin '16!

65 posted on 11/17/2012 4:55:32 PM PST by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: upsdriver
That's weak logic. First, the Tea Party supposedly is apart from the GOP so it should not b dependent on what any candidate is doing. Second the Tea Party was extremely active in getting Moudock nominated, and was active in the Steelman/Akin race, both of which were losses.

Third, some of the earlier successes have been regressing. Rubio is pushing the Dream Act, while Rand Paul has started saying some pretty un conservative things.

Cruz was a definite victory. But Jeff Flake is a serious step backward from Kyl. I don't' know if the Tea Party backed Flake but I assume they did as Palin did.

79 posted on 11/17/2012 5:42:53 PM PST by LS ('Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually.' Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson