Demonic-rats are circling obama’s wagon, including Feinstein.
His admin disputed the notion that politics or other motives caused the changes in Rice’s script.
LIARS ALL.
Oh I get it! We’re playing the “we’re stupid card” . Gets them everytime.
Maybe after the original 9/11 we should’ve pretended the towers were brought down by windshear. Better yet, that they’re still standing. If you don’t point to empty space and say, “Gosh, the twins look beautiful today,” the terrorists win.
Right. . .we don’t want to tip off the terrorists in case they may have forgotten they attacked us. ..we don’t want to remind them. . ..this is exactly how Bush should have handled his 911. . .darn!
Notice how the questions asked of Petraeus and other information from the White House, all divert away from Rep. King’s question of who changed the original intelligence information from “Al Qaeda” to “terrorists”.
If it wasn’t the CIA (says Petraeus), was it SecyDefense Panetta; National Intelligence Director (now that’s an oxymoron moron if ever there was one) Clapper (I think he’s a complete fool); the head of the National Security Council whoever that is; Obama’s Intelligence Czar Brennan (I think he’s another loser); Intelligence/Foreign Affairs Advisor Donilon (whoever he is); the VP/President, etc?
US Ambassador to the UN should be fired for being so stupid as to tell the lies she did on television. They “say” she was reading from “unclassified intelligence talking points”.
The only “points” were the ones on her head for believing this bullshit. SHe should be fired for sheer stupidity as well as covering up the Benghazi attack by lying to the American people and the whole world. And she is one of Obama’s “best and brightest”? More like “worst, dimmest and stupidest” if you ask me.
This whole affair has more coverups than a Mafia cemetary.
Lock all these stupid bastards up and bring in some 10 year olds to run the damn country, we would be better off!
It would be funny if we had not lost four Americans and if there weren’t other Americans who were severely wounded. What shrink came up with this notion that terrorists will not strike again if you pretend they do not exist? Have these people ever had children?
Never mind that the Arab world was privy to video of the crazy video protesters scaling the hole in the wall at the consulate/mission and later walking through the gate that was not guarded because the cowardly guards wet themselves and ran when the video protesters showed up with weapons and started torching the place. Uh huh. Real smart to pretend there was no terrorist attack. It looked so much better to spread the story about a video unknown to the entire world.
Gee Wally. Would have been too obvious if they wore Al Qeda emblems on their clothes and claimed responsability right after the attack.
All this to allow AQ time to scatter fhroughout North African canyons and deserts, so they can stealthily sneak up on them like Wile E. Coyote on the Roadrunner. What a diabolically clever plan. That makes sense to the average idiot, sure.
Looks like the real reason Petraeus was fired - I mean resigned was over his unwillingness to go along with all the lies of this government.
Oh please, what idiots will fall for this one...oh wait...never mind.
>> the groups
Al Groupé?
Good God, even that bit of flood-the-zone agitprop isn't on script. It was the Rahman Brigades, the Blind Sheik weenies...
"al-Zawahiri wanted revenge for al-Libi -- and remember al-Libi was a terrorist who specialized in attacking embassies! -- and so they get the "Rahman Brigades" to do it as almost a cut-out, instead of AQSL->LIFG, who you would have expected as the first stringers if it had been a Turk-related arms deal gone bad." -- Me
Now we can’t say their name... like Voldemort! I mean.. you-know-who
Still waiting for the bombs to fall in Libya in retaliation.. 0bama didn’t have any problem doing that when it came to helping the terrorists who killed us take control.
Ah, the wonders of closed hearings. The politicians can question witneses and we still won't know what the real testimony is, because we are notdirectly privy to it, but are subject instead to only hear from politicians of all sides claim they heard this or that. The New York Times really had to twist that that load of bullspit to make it sound like it came directly from Petraeus himself- if you don't read it through you miss the "lawmakers said" part.
It should read : Lawmakers said Mr. Petraeus said the names of groups suspected in the attack including Al Qaedas franchise in North Africa and a local Libyan group, Ansar al-Shariah were removed from the public explanation of the attack immediately after the assault to avoid alerting the militants that American intelligence and law enforcement agencies were tracking them...
It's still idiotic and illogical to claim references to AQIM and Ansar al Sharia were removed to avoid alerting the "militants" [terrorists] that we were on their trail when it took weeks to get investigators to the site and WHEN ANSAR AL SHARIAH TOOK PUBLIC CREDIT FOR THE ATTACK the SAME DAY!
The problem we had in Benghazi is clear enough in this article, where our media and lawmakers seem to have trouble labeling terrorists, "terrorists" and instead try to choose politically correct terms such as the generic "militant" to decribe jihadists.
This government’s unbelievable. There’s more spin going on than we’d see at a playground full of kids hyped up on jolt cola.
This still does not answer WHY there was no help for the doomed four sometime in their last 7 hours. Obfuscation, obfuscation, obfuscation( to paraphrase Fr. Mulcahey).