Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brown Deer
The major claim by Zullo in the affidavit is that the grandparents or SADO herself could have registered a birth to an HI resident that occurred outside HI and thus triggered the two newspaper announcements.

Zullo’s affidavit does not in any way challenge SADO as the mom but assumes that she was the mom and that either she or her parents registered POTUS Barry's birth. Period.

The INS FOIA docs include a claim that SADO was pregnant and the docs include a claim that BHO Sr. was the dad and also that the birth occurred on Aug 4, 1961 and that the mom was living with her parents at the time. The intent of SADO to move to WA immediately after the birth is also claimed in the INS FOIA docs.

The Dunham’s address of the parents corroborated in Polk is the address in the newspaper articles announcing an child born to Mr. and Mrs, BHO Sr.

All of the claimed FOIA and newspaper docs and evidence can be subjected to forensic analysis if if came to that, but there aren't any documents or evidence that can be forensically verified in support of the Mal-Val narrative that I have seen.

45 posted on 11/18/2012 2:49:55 PM PST by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from mini-drone attacks in the "Runway Kill Zone" (search term))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

Really? the “major claim” buried way down in the middle of the affidavit? and it mentioned that SADO could have submitted the announcement? Really?

Are you delusional?


47 posted on 11/18/2012 2:56:17 PM PST by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson