Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMR 4350

You and myself are the only ones I know that have came to that conclusion. My reasons are that the ambassador had information that could be embarrassing to both obama and Hillary.To wit: He knew where the bodies were buried. In addition to that, his usefulness was over. He went from an asser to a libality. And since dead men tell no tales, the attack was to cover his murder.The others were just collateral damage.


162 posted on 11/16/2012 11:30:52 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: sport
I don't think they intended for him to be killed.

Stevens trusted these people, and I believe the idea was to take him hostage and make it appear as if the republicans had collaborated with the terrorist for another “October Surprise” like the dems cooked up against Reagan with Carter.

The dems attaching Obama to the hip of Carter before the attack wasn't just a coincidence.

I believe it was a set up for Hillary to run against Romney in 2016. After 4 years of “October Surprise” from the news media she would be a walk in.

Look at what Obama faces now. An economy which he intentionally trashed. The middle east is in flames because of his policies. Terrorist now have massive amounts of heavy weapons because of Obama.

Everything indicates Obama was intentionally creating as much mess as possible to leave for the next president and he had no intention of being that president.
I

181 posted on 11/16/2012 12:28:51 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson