Yesterday, I think on this thread (so many threads, though) there was some detailed back and forth about whether Patreaus actually even said the attack was due to the video. According to someone or two, that statement came from a Dem repeating what Patreaus supposedly said. I don’t know if there is a quote/audio of Patreaus actually saying it.
I’m not saying one way or another as I do not know.
Nor am I making any bets about what he said today as I do not know.
I do think the below comment is interesting, though:
Peter King would not comment on the aspect of who called for back-up and who denied cross-border support for the 41 Americans in Benghazi.
It seems to me that if Petraeus exonerated Obama, that King would come forward with that story, or the dems in the room would.
Now, if Petraeus said Obama left those Americans to die at the hands of terrorists, then that information would be handled in a very special way. It would not be leaked by the Dems, and the republicans would have to have several meetings on what to do with it.
THIS IS A CASE OF THE DOG (DEMS) NOT BARKING!
395 posted on Friday, November 16, 2012 6:22:25 AM by Triple
Feel free to get this idea out as you see fit...