Rep. Peter King say Petraeus testified that the original CIA talking points stated it was a terrorist attack and even referenced al Qaeda. Somewhere along the line it was removed after leaving CIA.
So why did Petraeus give false information three days later to the Congressional committee that the CIA believed it was connected to the video? Was he operating off of someone else’s talking points?
According to King, Petraeus said that he had told Congress in the briefing three days later that it was a terrorist attack. King said he didn't believe that was the case having attended the briefing. The CIA analysis was changed, but no one knows by whom. Petraeus said it goes thru an interagency process and didn't recognize the significance at the time. Sounds like Petraeus is part of the cover-up.