[xzins]

I agree with you for a large part, DFW. At the same time, they call it a campaign, because they realize its similarity to conducting a war.

In this case, information warfare is one of the greatest weapons available. If your opponent has a 5-1 advantage over you on transmission of information, then the “candidate stupid” position must acknowledge that.

[SoConPubbie]

I agree with you for a large part, DFW. At the same time, they call it a campaign, because they realize its similarity to conducting a war.

In this case, information warfare is one of the greatest weapons available. If your opponent has a 5-1 advantage over you on transmission of information, then the “candidate stupid” position must acknowledge that.

Sorry xzins, but no amount of PR, strategy or gamesmanship will save a completely flawed "product" like Mitt Romney.

It's like trying to put lipstick on a pig and telling me it's an attractive girl.

You don't nominate and promote a moderate/liberal (depending on the issue) GOP candidate with an extremely Progressive record and expect to win under any circumstances.

This was a failed experiment from the start, and many conservatives warned about this outcome from the start.