That is the reality of the situation.
My question is simply this: Is Petraeus going to paint a picture of a lawless president who uses mob tactics to topple military careers and get ambassadors killed just to save his own job? If so, how does one shame an Elector into not endorsing that tactic as the way to win the White House?
How do we shame anyone who thinks they can publicly endorse a blackmailer and career ruiner for president?
This is all predecated on Patraeus testifying that Obama was behind it all, or was so incompetent and disengaged that he let others run the White House for him while he played figurehead, and then hid from the consequences until after the election.
The testimony has to be so bad that even Democrats won't be willing to certify the election to such a bastard.
If Petraeus doesn't go there and instead backs up everything that Obama said, then this idea is all washed up.
-PJ
Wishful thinking, if Rape, BJ's from interns in the Oval, and lying under oath did not phase them, just what do you think it would take?
It can’t be just Petraeus word. He also must have a few “blue dresses” to back himself up.