Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CodeToad
>>“Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it”
>
>Except the 2012 NDAA doesn’t require invasion or rebellion. It simply requires the federal government to deem a person a target.

I don't remember where I saw it, but there was a conspiracy-theory type article I was reading which essentially claimed that some act (War Powers Act?) labeled the inhabitants of the US as enemies (argument that the civil war let the federal gov't conquer the States, thereby depriving the state-citizen of any rights)... if that is at all true, then We The People are the invasion, and asserting your rights (or state rights) is rebellion.

27 posted on 11/15/2012 4:56:53 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

Sounds like a conspiracy. What does bother is that the government can decide under various laws what an “enemy combatant” is or who is deemed hostile and warrants detention. It is an open ended decription.


28 posted on 11/15/2012 8:18:06 PM PST by CodeToad (Padme: "So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson