A poorly written article. It says a couple of times that Wallker "won't back down", but it never says just what it is she won't back down from.
Is she refusing to recount more votes, or what?
I agree with you. The article makes statements and attributes them to her, but doesn’t quote her saying it.
This is a quote by her that comes close to ‘won’t back down’:
“I am confident that every vote has been counted accurately, that the certified results that the board signed off on Sunday are accurate, and I can stand on that,” Walker said.