Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: smokingfrog
I think she should go all the way and become a trisexual.
2 posted on
11/12/2012 7:10:41 PM PST by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: smokingfrog
The (Peaches and Herb ?) song "Reunited" is now playing in my head.
4 posted on
11/12/2012 7:14:54 PM PST by
machogirl
(First they came for my tagline, it's back. 2008, the Decline of America)
To: smokingfrog
Well, is she mostly male turned female. She has lots of extra parts? I’m confused. . .
6 posted on
11/12/2012 7:17:39 PM PST by
mia
To: smokingfrog
No male would be desperate enough to want to be within 50 feet of that whore so “bi” is clearly a lie.
7 posted on
11/12/2012 7:19:40 PM PST by
Gay State Conservative
(Benghazi: What Did Baraq Know And When Did He Know It?)
To: smokingfrog
Women can get away with calling themselves “bisexual”, with guys, well it’s like The Diceman said, “You either do or you don’t, there is no in-between.”
8 posted on
11/12/2012 7:19:40 PM PST by
dfwgator
To: smokingfrog
Sorry....these people are sick perverts.
To: smokingfrog
So, will she play AC/DC at her swearing in?
To: smokingfrog
Just damn!
This filthy Marxist America-Hater is not only an open lesbian, but an avowed communist.
My AZ district went for a strong conservative, but I still cringe that other districts in my state would put someone to the left of Obama into the House.
JUST DAMN!
13 posted on
11/12/2012 7:21:57 PM PST by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: smokingfrog
but what about bawny fwanks
14 posted on
11/12/2012 7:22:48 PM PST by
dalebert
To: smokingfrog
What’s worse than that is her far-left political views.
15 posted on
11/12/2012 7:25:12 PM PST by
HiJinx
(Bring back public hangings!)
To: smokingfrog
Beer goggles conveniently included.....
17 posted on
11/12/2012 7:26:11 PM PST by
edpc
(Wilby 2012)
To: smokingfrog
Does this mean she’s going to screw both the Liberals and the Conservatives??.. inquiring minds..
19 posted on
11/12/2012 7:27:53 PM PST by
carlo3b
(Less Government, more Fiber..)
To: smokingfrog
Do they still allow open heterosexuals in the Democrat party?
21 posted on
11/12/2012 7:33:29 PM PST by
Joshua
To: smokingfrog
I knew it wasn’t a Log Cabin Republican.
22 posted on
11/12/2012 7:34:12 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
To: smokingfrog
23 posted on
11/12/2012 7:36:20 PM PST by
AJFavish
(www.allanfavish.com)
To: smokingfrog
“bisexual” = no desire to control her desire.
Disgusting.
29 posted on
11/12/2012 7:43:08 PM PST by
jagusafr
To: smokingfrog
Does this mean she can work both sides of the aisle?
To: smokingfrog
Finally, a chance for some real bipartisanship, or is that bi-partnership.
34 posted on
11/12/2012 7:52:00 PM PST by
Mister Da
(The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
To: smokingfrog
I hope that someday in America, openly conservative members of congress will receive the same level of acceptance and tolerance as the openly gay, openly bisexual, openly trisexual, and openly transgendered members.
35 posted on
11/12/2012 7:57:34 PM PST by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: smokingfrog
Why is the media so interested in everyone’s sexuality?
I could not care less...just vote to uphold and defend the Constitution!!!!!!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson