[what's up]

So why isn’t he demanding to be heard?

He will. But not before the Secy of State.

Her Heinous was hoping Petraeus would go first so she could fashion her story afterwards. Thus, she said she couldn't testify; her excuse is she has some globe-trotting to do.

But now that Petraeus is not testifying quite so fast Madame Clinton may end up going first after all. We can trust that she is not so happy about that.

[aynrandfreak]

that makes more sense than most of what I’ve heard about all this

[Terry Mross]

It is so funny watching the Clintons being used and left out to dry the way they used and left so many out to dry.

[AlanGreenSpam]

I don’t understand why Petraeus’s testimony is off the table?

Just because he had an affair and may be punished for that affair and is no longer a CIA employee, he IS A MATERIAL WITNESS.

Won’t they eventually drag him in for testimony anyway?

[TigersEye]

He will. But not before the Secy of State. Her Heinous was hoping Petraeus would go first so she could fashion her story afterwards. Thus, she said she couldn't testify; her excuse is she has some globe-trotting to do.

Good thinking!