To: GlockThe Vote
Obviously, Romney was not the super-manager that he claimed to be. However, he was doomed from the start, anyway. The GOP cannot win with a liberal.
28 posted on
11/12/2012 2:43:42 PM PST by
Tau Food
(Praise God. Trust God.)
To: Tau Food
Now, that’s what I was trying to say way back when we could have made a difference.
38 posted on
11/12/2012 2:49:29 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
To: Tau Food
Back to the tax return problem, he managed to escape review of his tax returns filed for a couple of relatively recent years ~ just after the Obama Great Recession started ~ so maybe he wasn't the great manager folks imagine ~ maybe he was the great financial loser who got blown away just like everybody else.
The Mittbots beat me quite forcefully for proposing that ~ kind of like I'd hit a sore spot somewhere ~ pulled off all the scabs!
39 posted on
11/12/2012 2:49:29 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: Tau Food
Obviously, Romney was not the super-manager that he claimed to be. However, he was doomed from the start, anyway. The GOP cannot win with a liberal.Ditto. When you start out not contesting your home state, and pick a running mate from a supposedly 50-50 state like WI, you're basically forced to run the table in other swing states.
I don't know if Rob Portman could have helped carry Ohio, but I believe he'd have had a fighting chance.
It's never too early to start thinking about 2016, but I have a feeling if the nominee doesn't come from a key swing state where he or she is very popular, say hello to POTUS Hilldebeest for 8 more years.
63 posted on
11/12/2012 3:05:36 PM PST by
rfp1234
(Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson