Replies

No kidding. This version contradicts points that were news yesterday. 1) FBI said it wasn't Broadwell who sents the threats. (just came from her computer) 2.) Kelley didn't know who sent the threats, they were under a screenname. 3.) The threats didn't identify Petraeus as who Kelley was supposed to stay away from.

That may have prompted the CIA director to send his own e-mails to Broadwell,...

May have? Solid reporting by the ComPost. /s

The reporting on this story smells a lot like MSM smokescreen.

Pat Caddell called it. Do you believe it yet?

Pat Caddell slams the media: They have become an “enemy of the people” Sept. 29, 2012(video 26:00)

Emotional Pat Caddell on the MSM ignoring Benghazi: “These people have no honor!” Oct. 27, 2012 (video at link 4:06)

The Media will not report the truth!

The reporting on this story smells a lot like MSM smokescreen.

The key will be in how the MSM portrays Kelley in their attempt to totally destroy Broadwell. Let them go first. Get them on record.

I am not defending the actions of Broadwell or Petraeus. But this is not about the affair. It is about Benghazi. The powers that be wanted to use this to destroy Petraeus. That isn't working--too many sympathies in DC. Now they are have to get to Petraeus through Broadwell.

Sadly, we have to wade through the media crap to get back to Benghazi.