Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rusty schucklefurd

Duh, that’s the point.


46 posted on 11/12/2012 1:02:40 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

re: “Duh, that’s the point.”

No, the so-called “point” was an irrelevancy. The “point” was that half the country didn’t VOTE for Lincoln in his re-election as though, somehow, that made his re-election illegitimate.

The “point” was irrelevant because the states that were in rebellion didn’t vote for or against Lincoln BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T PARTICIPATE in the election.

The equivalent would be like saying that Jefferson Davis didn’t receive any votes from half the country (the North) when he ran for election of the Confederate States of America.


51 posted on 11/13/2012 7:33:15 AM PST by rusty schucklefurd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson