Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer
So 17,700 votes for Obama in a row without even a single event of human error? That's one hell of a statistical trend.

What in life can be done 17,700 times without even a single error if not by design?

Processes with this performance are present but they are not so by chance.

AND you KNOW that these people all submitted their votes perfectly 17,700 times in a row without any mistakes at all how?

66 posted on 11/12/2012 7:53:32 AM PST by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: R0CK3T
So 17,700 votes for Obama in a row without even a single event of human error?

No, not in a row. It's roughly 400 perfect votes in a division, 59 times. There are over 1000 divisions, obviously not all divisions are 100% Obama country. But undoubtedly 100's of them are. So 59 perfect scores out of at least a few hundred tests.

As I said above, the best explanation is gatekeeping where the voter who "might need help" gets some help pressing the right button. A perfect 400 out of 400 is possible without gatekeeping but gatekeeping would make it almost certain.

Other than that, the voting machine is ridiculously easy, there is a large square that turns into a check mark next to Obama. The error rate is going to be very low although I need to look for some academic papers on how low.

69 posted on 11/12/2012 8:01:43 AM PST by palmer (Jim, please bill me 50 cents for this completely useless post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson