I already have explained. Romney lost and now you appear to be delighted with 4 more years of a known quantity and his failed administration.
“I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush.
So was I and I still am a registered Independent. I'm also intellectually capable of discerning the differences between Obama and any Republican, Libertarian, Green, Constitutional, etc. party candidate.
You can whine about Romney for eternity, but we have to live with an anti-American POS in the WH for four more years.
You didn’t explain anything.
Reagan last voted for a democrat president in 1948, the President he served under in WWII, which had just ended 3 years before, Reagan then became known for being conservative and campaigning for Eisenhower in 1952 and 1956, and Nixon in 1960, in time becoming a conservative icon, did that touch you and Mitt? Well it did affect Mitt, it drove him to leave the republican party.
Care to explain how voting for Truman in 1948 compares to Mitt voting democrat, fund raising as a democrat and supporting democrats in the 1990s?
You don’t think that different historical periods and political eras exist?
Romney did not start as an independent, he left the republican party to escape Reagan and conservatism.
Romney eventually became a supporter of the democrats and a fundraiser and voter.
Your devotion to the hard left rino even after the election, is bizarre, now we need to marginalize him and make sure that his liberal influence is diminished or eliminated in the GOP.
The election is over, now you are simply promoting liberalism.