Replies

Thanks for the update. But, but, but......799 faulty counted votes out of approximately 16 000 votes! That is an error close to 5%. In an election whose outcome is determined by less than a percent of the total vote!

Come on! It isn’t that hard to organize an election with a proper vote count. What the h..l is going on? (That was a rhetorical question BTW.)

Advanced mathematics, algorithms, a Rubik’s cube with endless paths to the same outcome. This Pandora's box is starting to reveal it's secrets. Seems some higher intelligence has carefully mapped out a “ just under the red flag threshold” flowchart showing what days, type, and select electronic factors will produce a recount percentage that will be accepted. Use these 3 days, result: .58. Case closed..... Use these 5 days, add random data card failure, result: .56....unless a full recount is without failures I'll bet the farm all possible combinations in constructing recounts will yield just above the .5 mark. Someone or some country instilled this system to defuse random recounts, ensuring the masses will dismiss fraudulent theory's after the first pass through. This appears to be a very complex mathematical algorithm, and we all know who and or what country could mastermind such mathematical programs.

“799 faulty counted votes out of approximately 16 000 votes! That is an error close to 5%..”

Absolutely! That is Congressman West's exact point- and it's a valid one. They need to count ALL 37000 early votes. Especially since her official notice said she was going to and then changed her mind.

I still don't know who his legal counsel is- but he needs to hire someone GOOD and AGRESSIVE.