Replies

“Jackass statement of the day!
If we become more like them, we’ll lose worse.”

No disagreement with you there.

But — what are you going to do about the new “ladyparts voters”? (I take the claim for this new term)
70% of them voted for the ‘rats. They are a growing demographic (young, single women).

And they are but one of several growing demographic groups on the other side.

The right has a real problem here. The country is dividing, and the people “on the left” are growing in numbers, while the people “on the right” aren’t (in fact, many conservatives are from the World War II generation and on the verge of dying off).

Conservatives are waging a war of attrition. Unfortunately, it’s our side that is attritin’ more rapidly!

But — what are you going to do about the new “ladyparts voters”? (I take the claim for this new term) 70% of them voted for the ‘rats. They are a growing demographic (young, single women).

Sorry, but you are seeing trends that you think are static and enduring and part of the larger culture.

They aren't. They're transient and more a function of the lousy candidate we had this election that no more represented the base than McCain, or Dole, in fact, he represented them even less.

Romney backed both Abortion and the Gay Agenda.

Romney had no definitive plan for limited government or reducing the size of goverment in any meaningful amount.

The so-called trends and observation offered up by the Conservative media and the left-wing media refuse to take this into account, because (especially for the conservative media) this would mean they would have to accept responsibility that they did not do their job during the primaries and truly vet Romney. Instead, they took the tact of sitting on their hands, for the most part.

Romney, being the pitiful candidate that he was, was the primary cause of this ugly loss that we had.