Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vladiator
Mitt lost. He needed to win. This is not an excuse.

Back when the rep primaries started, almost everybody here put Romney dead last in their ranking of the candidates, some like me didn't even have him on their list, him and the screw ball ambassador, I've forgotten his name. It was literally forbidden to talk up a Romney nomination, people were banned from here for trying. He was considered by many, if not most, to be the only candidate who could not beat the utter and abject failure Obama.

Yes indeed, Mitt lost. Mitt lost because he's Mitt. A person with no values other than whatever political wind blowing at the time takes him.

Obama is awful, I cannot imagine anyone worse than him for our country but I hope that one good thing I see as a result of this election is that Romney is, hopefully, prayerfully, gone forever from the national political scene.

12 posted on 11/09/2012 4:34:34 PM PST by Graybeard58 (What G.O.P.e. candidate is in store for us in 2016?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Graybeard58

We knew Mitt well here, his history being all too painful, but most of America didn’t. Who did you hear, outside of these web pages, complaining about a “no values” Mitt???

I think he waited too long to come on strong. He needed to be jumping down Barack’s throat, on Barack’s case, at least a month sooner than he did.


13 posted on 11/09/2012 4:38:24 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson