Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antceecee

you are correct- the gop will never pursue it- because itr won’t do a damn bit of good to pursue it- the left lie cheat and steal and nothign ever gets done about it- our president goes to bed while 4 Americans are screaming for help and fightign for their lives, and nothing will ever be doen about it

Now, if the gop did what the left did in pa- they would be demanding that the election be put on hold until all the facts are known- and romeny would NOT be sworn in until this issue was beat to death by the left- and all the mainstream media would be playing hte ongoing ‘investigation’ right to the end every day all day-

The fact is that the left are evil, and apaprently most peopel in this country love evil leaders and will NEVER hold them accou8tnable for ANYTHING- but let a moral republican make a mistake, and thsoe that love evil seethe with anger and will do everythign in their power to destroy said person- and htey will have the full blessings of the press too-

Let’s face it0- Evil is the rule of the day- and we simply have to accept it

(Where is the tea party? Where are the wealthy donors to the tea party demanding investigations into votor fraud? Buying ad after ad accusing the left of voter fraud until; the main stream media is FORCED to cover the issue?

The GOP has lost hteir never for politics- they have lost their morality and decency as a whole- (Yes, there are still some who haven’t compromised and still call for investigations, but hteir voices get drowned out by the filibustering of the left)


7 posted on 11/08/2012 9:23:50 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
It's the same problem Nixon faced in 1960. There was plenty of evidence of vote fraud in Illinois and Texas, maybe elsewhere, but how to prove it? The culprits would have destroyed all the evidence. Just like when Landslide Lyndon won the Senate primary in 1948 by 87 votes and the cleaning lady accidentally threw out the evidence.

Nixon at best might have denied Kennedy a majority, but it probably would have gone to the House of Representatives (adding Illinois and Texas would not have given Nixon enough electoral votes because of Sen. Byrd getting 15 votes).

It would be unthinkable for Romney to challenge the results now--with a black President.

I recall right before the election in Venezuela, Chavez's opponent's supporters thought they were going to win.

27 posted on 11/08/2012 10:09:47 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson