Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: daniel1212; Lera; Colofornian

I find it incredulous that with 80% of the Evangelicals who voted voting for Romney, that someone would think that it’s a credible accusation to make against them that they sat out the election because they didn’t like his politics.

Say what?

It makes no sense.


77 posted on 11/08/2012 8:23:59 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; daniel1212
I find it incredulous that with 80% of the Evangelicals who voted voting for Romney, that someone would think that it’s a credible accusation to make against them that they sat out the election because they didn’t like his politics. Say what? It makes no sense.

It makes a LOT of sense to the RINO pseudoconservatives.

To them, RINOism is ne'er the problem; the problem is seemingly ALWAYS the Evangelical.

Freeper SaraJohnson said something along those lines in a post to me earlier today.

The RINOs blamed Palin, an Evangelical, in 08...

But now that Palin & McCain have been proven to have attracted more votes than Romney & Ryan, they have been vindicated before the RINOs.

The RINOs need an updated 2012 scapegoat; Evangelicals, kicked to the gutter at the beginning of this campaign, are easy targets.

82 posted on 11/08/2012 8:57:11 PM PST by Colofornian (Some say "we're not voting 4 'pastor-in-chief'" --as if "gods-in-embryo" were divine only on Sundays)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson