To: mojito
This is not the first time state-hood has won in PR. The issue is congress has not voted to admit it into the Union. The reason is the fix apportionment of 435 congressmen. PR would be entitled to 5 congressmen, thus five states would lose a seats. Given that the congress is fixed at 435, states that have disproportional representation would lose a seat. So a state that should technically get 5.6 seat and is rounded to 6, would be a likely choice to lose a seat.
16 posted on
11/07/2012 10:22:37 AM PST by
11th Commandment
(http://www.thirty-thousand.org/)
To: 11th Commandment
Congress can increase the size of the House through an Act Of Congress. No other state would lose seats if the size of the House was increased.
18 posted on
11/07/2012 10:26:00 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: 11th Commandment
This is not the first time state-hood has won in PR. The issue is congress has not voted to admit it into the Union. The reason is the fix apportionment of 435 congressmen. PR would be entitled to 5 congressmen, thus five states would lose a seats. Given that the congress is fixed at 435, states that have disproportional representation would lose a seat. So a state that should technically get 5.6 seat and is rounded to 6, would be a likely choice to lose a seat. Thanks for that info, it explains a lot. I kew that Cuba always tried to block statehood and encourage revolution for independence but there is the congressional seat issue too, which people tend to forget.
37 posted on
11/07/2012 9:27:50 PM PST by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson