Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mgist

Just like you, I find that this makes no sense. How did a tired old man (McCain) attract more votes after four years of chaos...when I apply Occam’s Razor to the question the unpleasant possibility is that we have three million more formerly productive people relying on government largesse due to the the shrinking private sector. Knowing what the administration is capable of, I am open to seeing evidence of massive fraud (’by any means necessary’). Honestly, though, I think that our DWTS nation is pretty comfortable in it’s current decline.


30 posted on 11/07/2012 6:25:55 AM PST by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dogcaller

It makes perfect sense. McCain, as sad as he was, was always better on social conservative issues in his history. Romney was just an all around awful candidate for conservatives.

We told them this over and over and over again.


31 posted on 11/07/2012 6:28:18 AM PST by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: dogcaller

The “tired old man” had Palin, she got a lot of the GOP voters to the polls. Now, perhaps she got a lot of Dem voters to the polls as well, so it’s hard to gauge her net effect, but clearly she contributed a lot to McCain’s total.

Romney was not a good candidate, and Ryan did absolutely nothing for him as well. In 2004 W got 62 million votes. Adjusting for demographic trends, it would translate to 65-66 million votes today. Romney got 58.5 million at most.

He left 6-7 million GOP voters sitting at home, and no wonder.


36 posted on 11/07/2012 6:30:49 AM PST by ubaldus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson