[D-fendr]

Did the “party” say it wouldn’t back Sarah if she entered and won? Who? Who said that?

>>>”Palin is only the side issue here..

I see it as your evidence for your theory. And I see your theory falling on the evidence offered.

But you are right on one part: Palin is a side issue. She didn’t enter the race. You can’t win the primary if you don’t enter; you can’t win the general if you don’t win the primary.

We had a pick of those that entered. Romney defeated those handily. It is debatable now whether that speaks highly of Romney or lowly of the others.

But, Palin is moot.

[Timber Rattler]

I see it as your evidence for your theory. And I see your theory falling on the evidence offered.

Oh, so the GOP-E has NOT been attacking Conservatives and trying to co-opt or undermine TEA party candidates?

[presently no screen name]

Did the “party” say it wouldn’t back Sarah if she entered and won? Who? Who said that?

Do you enjoy showing how clueless you are?