Okay, I see what you’re saying. Cases concerning ambassadors and such and ones which states are a party to are the only kinds Congress can’t touch. But there’s another way around this. Some people think, and I tend to agree, that due process requires judicial review.
More detailed, but I think there's some records/debates concerning the Constitution [and its ratification?] dealing w/ Judicial Review: essentially it was considered but rejected. {Strict Constitutionalism doesn't allow it... of course many 'conservatives' would balk at strict Constitutionalism.}