Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barack Obama (D-Lame Duck)
Townhall.com ^ | November 5, 2012 | Dan Holler

Posted on 11/05/2012 12:00:15 PM PST by Kaslin

Regardless of the outcome of Tuesday’s presidential election, Barack Obama will immediately become a lame duck. That is not to say he will be powerless, but he will never again have to face the wrath of American voters.

Even if Mitt Romney prevails tomorrow (which I think he will), President Obama will have 75 days to ram through any number of economically destructive regulations and executive orders. Make no mistake, an aggressive administration can push things across the finish line in the waning days regardless of their popularity; and that is especially true of this administration.

Prior to the election, President Obama’s team postponed action on some of its most ambitious regulations – a terrifying thought given the destructiveness of what they’ve already done.

The Heritage Foundation’s Diane Katz explains, “There is ample reason to believe that this recent “draw-back” of rulemaking portends a regulatory tsunami in the coming year.” Just look at the list of regulations on hold. It reads like a handbook on how to lose an election:

· Stricter ozone emission standards, which could cost $90 billion per year and jeopardize millions of jobs, have been shelved until 2013;

· Numerous global warming regulations (I am looking at you Mayor Bloomberg) are on hold;

· Efforts to designate coal ash as a “hazardous substance,” estimated to cost $79 billion to $110 billion and thousands of jobs in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Missouri and Ohio, are also on hold;

· A $2.7 billion mandate that all new cars and trucks come equipped with rear-view camera and video display is delayed; and

· In the interest of not crippling the economies of Pennsylvania and Ohio, the $20 billion Boiler MACT rules are on hold.

Unfortunately, the list goes on. Just how many of these regulations an outgoing Obama administration could finalize in 75 days is unknown, but Katz says the “very uncertainty is itself damaging to the economy.”

Of course, the picture is even worse if President Obama prevails tomorrow. We can all but guarantee these regulatory proposals and many more will quietly strangle our sluggish economy between now and 2016. At least businesses will have some certainty, right?

With four more years, President Obama can do much more than attack America by regulatory overreach, though. The Weekly Standard’s Jeffrey Anderson explains a second term will allow President Obama to “cement the result of his first term that Americans like least—Obamacare.”

A timeline of Obamacare’s implementation reveals the seriousness of Anderson’s statement. In 2013, Americans of all income levels will face an array of new taxes and then, in 2014, the individual and employer mandates will take effect. Added to the dozens of other provisions and thousands of pages of regulation, 2016 seems a long way off.

No doubt New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg would like to see President Obama push even more aggressively on the issue of global warming. With four extra years, perhaps the President could create a Secretary of Ice, who is tasked with creating more arctic ice, which could help lower sea levels around the globe.

I shouldn’t give them ideas, I know. After all, in the suddenly competitive state of Minnesota, former President Bill Clinton claimed, “in the real world, Barack Obama’s policies work better.” According to Clinton, you can “fight global warming in economically beneficial ways.” Ice creation may well be economically beneficial. Heck, if they think the government can suddenly confiscate money for an existing behavior and that in turn will create jobs, anything thing is possible.

From absurd regulations to Obamacare and global warming, a second term would mean, as Charles Krauthammer said, the “American experiment — the more individualistic, energetic, innovative, risk-taking model of democratic governance — [will continue] to recede, yielding to the supervised life of the entitlement state.”

Just how high are the stakes?

An Ohio voter told MSNBC she not only thought the “stimulus was a really big success,” and that “you know, I want government to play a role in our lives.” You can rest assured President Obama is more than happy to comply.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackobama; govregulations; lameduck; obama; popularity

1 posted on 11/05/2012 12:00:16 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
“you know, I want government to play a role in our lives.”

move to Argentina

2 posted on 11/05/2012 12:02:50 PM PST by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hate to think what they will do to our White House before the move out in January. And President Romney and First Lady Ann Romney will be too kind to call them out on it and quietly have the damages repaired.


3 posted on 11/05/2012 12:04:47 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Romney/Ryan 2012 The Future of Our Children and Their Children are at stake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lame is right, but the second word does rhyme with duck.


4 posted on 11/05/2012 12:06:09 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"With four extra years, perhaps the President could create a Secretary of Ice, who is tasked with creating more arctic ice, which could help lower sea levels around the globe."

Do NOT give this administration new ideas!

5 posted on 11/05/2012 12:07:55 PM PST by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

You can be sure the cleaning crew will have to use tons of cans of Febreze to get the stench out.


6 posted on 11/05/2012 12:09:57 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Romney will need to undo every EO.


7 posted on 11/05/2012 12:15:45 PM PST by stephenjohnbanker ((God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Executive Orders” can be overturned by the congress. Almost all require some sort of funding. The funding must be denied.Some may be un-constitutional and must be taken through the courts. He may try to rule like a dictator but he can be stopped by a determined congress.


8 posted on 11/05/2012 12:16:38 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Correct


9 posted on 11/05/2012 12:18:29 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No doubt New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg would like to see President Obama push even more aggressively on the issue of global warming.


If he does then he just might have the desire to see his city’s population decrease due to disease, poor medicine, Fire and Police departments cutting personnel. Crime and the other social ills that accompany a city in decline.

Why? Because the Da*n regulations, rules, laws etc. designed to “help” stop global warming instead stopped the engine of the economy! No Economy = No wages, No wages = No Taxes, No Taxes = A BROKE CITY GOVERNMENT!


10 posted on 11/05/2012 12:18:32 PM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Barack Obama (D-Lame Duck)

Fixt. :-P

11 posted on 11/05/2012 12:37:09 PM PST by uglybiker (nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker; Kaslin
Romney will need to undo every EO.

Probably so. At least we will be able to understand Romney's real agenda based on the ones he chooses to keep in place.

12 posted on 11/05/2012 12:40:19 PM PST by newheart (The greatest trick the left ever pulled was convincing the world it was not a religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We need a LANDSLIDE turnout for Romney and Republicans. 1. To assure control of the House and Senate with the power to overturn EOs and thereby 2. to discourage Bronco Bama from wasting everyone’s time with EOs.


13 posted on 11/05/2012 1:04:13 PM PST by StraightDave (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StraightDave
We need a LANDSLIDE turnout for Romney and Republicans.

And then give him the keys to AF-1,because what ever the cost of more golf and vacations it is still cheaper than having him around the WH.
14 posted on 11/05/2012 1:12:27 PM PST by Foolsgold (L I B Lacking in Brains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
First thing the new Congress should do is rein in the power of an Executive Order.
15 posted on 11/05/2012 3:26:19 PM PST by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smedley
Do NOT give this administration new ideas!

Arctic ice wouldn't help with sea levels anyway. Antarctic ice might.

I'd support that if the whole regime would undertake to do it "on-site".

16 posted on 11/05/2012 5:18:02 PM PST by thulldud (Is it "alter or abolish" time yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson