To: conservativesister
Ridiculous argument; it was Roberts who was appointed by a Republican who declared the mandate to be perfectly legit. -- Therefore, we cannot be assured that the 'R' next to a name means that we will get good USSC Justices.
Furthermore, being a republican doesn't mean they support the free market: remember TARP?
4 posted on
11/04/2012 11:22:01 AM PST by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
To: OneWingedShark
being a republican doesn't mean they support the free market Maybe not, but being a RAT absolutely means they don't.
5 posted on
11/04/2012 11:25:06 AM PST by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month)
To: OneWingedShark
True, but we are guaranteed that if Obama picks more justices they will be as left wing as his first two picks. Even Reagan picked a dud or two, but they were/are still better than any current sitting justice appointed by a D president.
To: OneWingedShark
“Ridiculous argument; “
Care to explain, I’ve missed your point, since I’m talking 3rd party votes that will re-elect Obama.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson