To: jwsea55
As soon as I saw PA 82.4% to 17.7% for 0bama, I relxed and realized just how wrong this is. 100.1% ? ? ?
PA should at least be a toss up - not a lock for 0dumbo.
4 posted on
11/02/2012 8:48:48 PM PDT by
airborne
(MY HEROES DON'T WEAR CAPES. MY HEROES WEAR DOG TAGS ! ! !)
To: airborne
As soon as I saw PA 82.4% to 17.7% for 0bama, I relxed and realized just how wrong this is. 100.1% ? ? ? PA should at least be a toss up - not a lock for 0dumbo.
Did you notice the percentages added up to more than 100%. Now that is confidence!
12 posted on
11/02/2012 8:55:21 PM PDT by
jwsea55
To: airborne
As soon as I saw PA 82.4% to 17.7% for 0bama, I relxed and realized just how wrong this is. 100.1% ? ? ?It's a rounding issue, not an error. Likely 82.35 and 17.65 both getting rounded up to the nearest tenth.
15 posted on
11/02/2012 8:58:37 PM PDT by
Teacher317
('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson