Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kwikrnu; All
This case illustrates PRECISELY why certain types of arms should not be prohibited in the United States: No law enforcement officer knows about every possible type of firearm, and taking an attitude of "prone 'em out when in doubt" (I have actually heard this) violates our 2nd Amendment rights, as well as our right to be free from false arrest.

Message to government: LEAVE US ALONE! We should be able to procure, own and carry ANY firearm or knife or sword we please, as long as we attack no one.

5 posted on 11/02/2012 9:32:55 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (My game is disruption. I will use lethal force --my vote-- in self-defense against Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: backwoods-engineer

I agree. The 6th cirsuit states that the ranger had qualified immunity because my handgun was 1/2 inch shorter than the legal limit, even though they made no attempt to measure it in the two hours I was held against my will.

The thought process of the 6th circuit COA will now allow cops to detain persons carrying 16.25 inch barreled rifles or 18.25 inch barreled shotguns.


8 posted on 11/02/2012 9:38:03 AM PDT by kwikrnu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson