Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Anyone know if all states are reporting? I heard something last night that New York and New Jersey numbers wouldn’t be incldued...can’t confirm.

How do you get an increase in non-farm hiring and a rise in the rate? Shouldn’t htey work inversely? I think need to turn off the TV until next Wednesday. Thanks for the post, though..


9 posted on 11/02/2012 5:39:07 AM PDT by SueRae (See it? Hell, I can TASTE November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SueRae

Market not liking the number


13 posted on 11/02/2012 5:40:36 AM PDT by scooby321 (AMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

The report said that approximately 400,000 people starting looking for work this past month. Under the stupid BLS formula, the more people that are looking for work and do not find work, the more unemployment.

That’s why Rush has been saying that the only way to manufacture a decrease in unemployment is to shrink the universe of people looking for a job. It worked in the inverse this month.


18 posted on 11/02/2012 5:41:40 AM PDT by mrs9x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: SueRae

The U rate went up because the labor force grew so more people were looking for work.

To keep the rate steady we have to grow at a 3% rate according to history.

This job growth is way too low to bring the 23+ million without full time work back. Even 200,000 per month would take TEN years to get back to 2007.


76 posted on 11/02/2012 5:09:35 PM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson