It will do Romney no good at all to bring it up unless he has evidence and can PROVE it. If a whistleblower comes to Romney, he’s all set. Otherwise, Obama will just sneer and make excuses, which would do Romney no good at all.
“It will do Romney no good at all to bring it up unless he has evidence and can PROVE it. If a whistleblower comes to Romney, he’s all set. Otherwise, Obama will just sneer and make excuses, which would do Romney no good at all.”
True, which is why his approach should be to simply ask questions, one of which should be: “The President said during the second debate that he issued a directive to secure our personnel. There have been some reports that the the ex-seals who were killed were denied requested backup. Who did the President issue this directive to? Did this person disobey the President’s directive? What was the actual sequence events that led up to the fact that there was no military support provided? I think the President could answer questions that relate to his own actions on the night of 9/11 right now and agree with me that the American people have a vested interest in understanding what went wrong in the chain of command that resulted in the the deaths of Americans at Benghazi”
I don’t think such a question could be easily manipulated by the media for political reasons. Let’s shine the light on these liars.