Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billflax
From the perspective of voting by religion, I'll take the Mormon over the Marxist any day.

The Mormon part doesn't bother me in the least. A vote for Romney isn't a vote for Mormonism. It's not like Romney, if elected president, is going to make Mormonism the state religion.

If you're going to vote with religion as your top issue, then vote for the candidate more likely to protect religious freedoms and curtail government assaults on the practice of religion and its values. I think it's pretty obvious which man is the better choice.

Now, the candidate with the best stance on religion isn't Romney or Obama, but a third party (obviously). But determining the best choice of candidate has a practical aspect to it. Voting for a third party candidate is a nice way to state your stance to the world (albeit anonymously) and show your rejection of the major parties. However, if voting for a third party increases the chances of putting a Godless Marxist F*** like Obama back in office, I'm not going to do that. I'd rather put Romney in office and put actual conservatives in the House and Senate to check his centrist tendencies then increase the odds of putting someone back in office who is actively attacking religion.

We live in a practical world. Don't lose sight of that– Obama would love to use Faith as a weapon against the Faithful to get himself reelected by discouraging people from voting for Romney (the only viable alternative to Obama) based on his religion.
8 posted on 10/29/2012 8:09:18 PM PDT by verum ago (Some people must truly be in love, for only love can be so blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: verum ago

well said


17 posted on 10/29/2012 8:25:49 PM PDT by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: verum ago; All
We live in a practical world. Don't lose sight of that– Obama would love to use Faith as a weapon against the Faithful to get himself reelected by discouraging people from voting for Romney (the only viable alternative to Obama) based on his religion.

Exactly...we live in a practical world...

And unless you live in a genuine swing state, your pragmatic vote for somebody like Romney in a blue state -- or against Obama in a red state -- won't effect the electoral outcome in about 40 states...

So vote for Virgil Goode if you don't live in a purple state...

...and even then, if you can't stand voting for either of the pro-aborts or either of the healthcare socialists or Mitt the "god in embryo"...

After all, pragmatism is something...but it's not the end all...

40 posted on 10/29/2012 10:05:15 PM PDT by Colofornian ( >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: verum ago

Well thought out and well and concisely put. Pulls it all together on the question.

thanks..


42 posted on 10/29/2012 10:20:02 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: verum ago

Bless you for posting sense in a thread soiled by a mouth-foamer.


72 posted on 10/30/2012 11:44:24 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa (Vote for Goode, end up with evil, pat self on back repeatedly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: verum ago

The Mormon part doesn’t bother me in the least.

If Romney made Mormonism the state religion, I could accept that WAY more than if Obama made Islam the state religion. Good Lord...no contest.


78 posted on 10/30/2012 1:49:15 PM PDT by napscoordinator (GOP Candidate 2020 - "Bloomberg 2020 - We vote for whatever crap the GOP puts in front of us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson