Guess in order to remain competitive, the future GOP will have to move Left + promise more goodies to the Dems usual demographics blocs.
I could care less if the Republican Party survives.
Many if not most Asians and many Latinos marry middle class whites and raise families in suburbia. The white community may darken but will grow
Many if not most Asians and many Latinos marry middle class whites and raise families in suburbia. The white community may darken but will grow
As these youngsters grow older and experience the real world and begin to recognize the con artists for the shysters they really are, they begin to change from democrats to republicans.
They have since conspired with the communist faction of their fellow Washingtonians to make slaves of the working man outside of DC, under penalty of imprisonment via the IRS and the DOJ.
The Washingtonians have got it figured out, and basically fight every 4 years over control of the cash extorted from the working class.
The RNC and their greedy pulled back wives aren't much different than the DNC commies, it's all a scam.
In the sixties, conservative voters in the South figured out that the Democrat Party of their fathers and grandfathers was the enemy of their core beliefs in freedom, liberty, self reliance, and limited government. The South is now solid red. The rest of the country is starting to wake up and will likewise abandon the party of their forefathers.
The Republican Party should take note, however. If they act like Democrats, they will be abandoned as well and a new party will rise up. We are tired of writing the checks to support the Get-a-Check crowd.
As the West begins to endure true debt-induced austerity, we may very well see more younger people going conservative, as the majority of debt is being spent on programs for the baby-boomers, and the young are getting the worst of the deal - higher taxes and less employment mainly.
Start watching about 15:50. Niall Ferguson makes a very good case for this idea.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eu-VKTgXyR0
The only question posed by Michael Barone in his article was: “ Why are whites more one-sidedly partisan than just about ever before?”
In answering his question, Michael chose to answer the question by comparing Democrats and Republicans in terms of their voting percentages and various ethnic groups. Article topics and abundances are as follows:
White(s) 4
Non-Whites 3
Racial/racism 2
Minority 2
Black(s) 2
One each for topics of: University, Hispanics, Asians, ethnically and same-sex.
Michael chose to put his racially-colored glasses on and happily wrote his article. He was pleased. His Editor was pleased. The insulated Liberal Agenda Media was pleased.
Michael had lots of facts and high-faluting experts to use as fillers. Michael will probably get a raise, and maybe even an award from The Media, if not The RINO Party itself.
But did Michael answer the question?
After reading the article can one find that a major topic was left out?
BTW, gotta quit now. My back is killing me.
Don’t know why it is, but each year there seems to be more people in the wagon than pulling the wagon.
Just can’t figure it out!
Ouch, sorry FReepers, my back is plumb tuckered out from pulling the wagon tonight.
Sorry, I’ll try to pull it again tomorrow. Ouch! Dang!!
BTW, BTW, remember where I left off: Why are whites more one-sidedly partisan than just about ever before?