Replies

Taqqiya(lieing) is a good word.. I have yet to hear Obama speak any truth..
MAybe he does not know any truth..

Not only Obama but any democrat.. seems they compete on who tells the biggest whoppers..
They make an art form out of telling lies, like the Soviets did/DO..

To them the truth is whatever they say is the truth..
Theres something filthy, dirty about that..
To them “dirty tricks” are NORMAL.. natural..

Remember that next time you talk to a Union member..
They are mostly ALL democrats..

Grover Norquist: Obama’s Basically Stalin
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/09/grover-norquist-obamas-basically-stalin.php

"Shortly after the President announced his plans to adjust tax formulas and make the hyper-wealthy “pay their fair share,” Americans For Tax Reform president Norquist tweeted, “Obamas [sic] “new” strategy to divide America: Get the Kulaks.”

You’ll remember from your high school history lessons that the Kulaks were the “wealthy peasants” Stalin scapegoated in the late 1920s and early 1930s, as the Soviet regime stumbled through agricultural and economic chaos. With catchy slogans such as “We must eliminate the Kulaks as a class,” Stalin rallied the masses against this alleged enemy within.

The Kulaks largely operated outside the collective farm system, and given the vaguely capitalist inducements available to them they tended to fare slightly better than their communitarian counterparts. The Soviet authorities responded by accusing them of hoarding food and provoking famine. The vicious campaign against them only just avoids being termed a genocide because the Russians insisted on a UN definition that bases the crime on race and religion, but not on class."

hmm.. they never taught us that in the government's ~~schools~~" warehouse
b/c...if we had be taught that; then we would have seen it, for what it is now...
the Establishment mindset?

The author argues that the president, slavish to sharia law, is reluctant to kill Muslims and that explains the fiasco in Benghazi.

The problem with that is the president has been busily murdering Muslims from drones for four years. Further, although belatedly and only after much dithering and with ridiculous rules of engagement, he committed to a surge in Afghanistan. The author fails to explain these discrepancies except to say in effect that the crypto Muslim is actually a secular fundamentalist Muslim.

One who is sometimes guided by sharia law and sometimes not. I am willing to accept that Obama has Muslim sympathies, it is even conceivable that he is a closet Muslim, however, any argument that he simply will not countenance the killing of Muslims does not wash. Therefore the author comes up with some halfway explanation:

According to Sharia, it is a capital crime for a Muslim individual or leader to shoot at fellow Muslims -- even Islamists -- for the purpose of protecting Americans. That would make Obama a violator of Sharia and an apostate. If Obama considers himself a Muslim and wears an Islamic ring, then he must have had a very hard time deciding on how to protect the consulate without killing Muslim attackers. His solution? Settling for the lesser of two evils: getting Muslims, in the form of Libyan security, to guard the property and in this way, forcing Muslims to shoot other Muslims in order to defend the consulate.

The author would have us believe that Obama is a Muslim of convenience which is I suppose possible if there is a specie which the author describes as follows:

Obama has a Socialist/Islamic centered worldview -- a combination that is not uncommon in many parts of the Muslim world.

I suppose this means that Obama is a secular Muslim with some inclination toward sharia but with a secular worldview and an elastic Islamic conscience.

The Connection Between Muslim Inbreeding and Terrorism Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels studies the effects of Islamist inbreeding:

"If there are two things that characterize Islamic culture, they are terrorism and inbreeding. The latest research shows that these two things might be closely connected . . . First cousin marriages have been the tradition in many Muslim families for innumerable generations. Such marriages increase the risk of negative mental and physical consequences . . . Risk of mental retardation increases with 400 percent (Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 1978 “Effect of inbreeding on IQ and mental retardation”). Research shows that the IQ is 10-16 points lower in children born from blood related parents and that abilities related to social behavior and empathy develops slower in inbred babies (Indian National Science Academy, 1983 “Consanguinity Effects on Intelligence Quotient and Neonatal Behaviours of nsari Muslim Children” [pdf]). Such facts might make several pieces fall into place for many people . . . People with low intelligence (because of inbreeding) might also be easier to brainwash with fundamentalist Islam. "

My emphasis

Even if Islamist societies wanted to cooperate it would take a couple of generations after outlawing inbreeding and stopping the hateful Islamist indoctrination in the schools to settle things down.

Not all Islamist nutcases are the result of inbreeding.. some benefit from their positions and use the unfortunate to advance the life of 72 virgins and great wealth here on Earth.

There is no question in my mind -- I've worked with Muslims and lived in Ankara for almost a year -- that there is a difference between Muslim and Islamist.

Tens of millions of Muslims in Turkey do not want Islamism and sharia law

Opponents of the Islamist AK Party (from 3 or 4 years ago.. things may be getting more hopeless)

Read and see more