I responded to a post by a Freeper on another thread tonite; it fits here as well:
Freeper:
“I did not see Huckabee tonight, but someone on Twitter said that Catherine Herriage told the Gov that she had documents that proves the Obama Admin was running guns to Syria via Libya.”
My response:
I did see the program and she (Catherine) did say it. It appears we have a sub-story going on here, two stories for the price of one. There is the Obama & his henchmen didn’t come to the Ambassador/our Seals’ rescue story, and then there is the sub-plot of weapons transfers taking place. A ship appears in port in Libya with arms/munitions aboard it a few days before the Sept. 11th ambush takes place. The Turkish ambassador meets with the ship’s captain, and then, on Sept. 11th, that same Turkish ambassador meets with Christopher Stevens, our ambassador, shortly before the attack by Muzzie terrorists takes place.
Why was this Turkish intermediary meeting with our Ambassador? Was it for the transfer of weapons from Turkey through Libya to be delivered to opposition forces in Syria? Was this our conduit for getting weapons to the Syrian opposition, with Chris Stevens, our Ambassador, being right in the thick of it? Why did Stevens go to Benghazi on Sept. 11th, with no announcement or fanfare or protection to speak of. And to meet with the Turkish representative, right after a ship full of arms shows up in Libya coming from Turkey? Turkey, which sides with the opposition in Syria, and wants them armed. And our involvement being to grease the skids and facilitate getting these arms through Libya to Syria for opposition use. The thlot gets plicker. Perhaps this is why Steven’s visit to Benghazi that day was kept hush, hush. Because he was going there to help facilitate an arms transfer. Perhaps, if one wants to be more Machiavellian, that is why Obama & his minions that night thought it might be a better idea to just let the Ambassador and our navy seals be expendable rather than draw attention to what the real purpose of the meeting of the two Ambassadors prior to the attack was for. Just let the Ambassador die rather than let secrets get out.
Well, that worked real well, as I must say that Fox News’ Catherine Herridge, Jennifer Griffin, and Bret Baer, have all sunk their fangs into this story bigtime. Also one mightily irritated CIA is spilling the beans to House/Senate Pubs behind the scenes, blowing the whistle on the Obama regime as to what really is happening rather than take the fall for this goon Prez.
Stay tuned, in best Flash Gordon serial style, for the next episode.
P.S., Petraeus is on Obama’s side. Maybe to try to cover up the arms transfers that are secretly taking place as I stated above. Or maybe he really thinks like a Dem, or his ambitions override a sense of honor. Don’t trust him anymore. Not since he went to work for Obama.
The next shoe to drop is the connection between the Justice dept and the leader of the group that killed the ambassador . Jennifer Daskal helped the leader get out of GITMO and get him transferred to Libyan prison. She is one of several left wing Amercian haters in Justice. Does she still have him on speed dail? Goods question to ask in a hearing.
Now you know why Justice and the FBI took 3 weeks to get on site.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/item_LKigyfMmBAPWGXMBp5Mn3O
I saw it, she did not say that.. maybe “implied it” but did not say it.. shes not stupid...
That whistle blower has not come forward yet.. so far.. publicly..
Sadly, only FOX is covering this scandal!!