Either that, or he is talking about being ordered to stand down.
We probably won't know the truth until after the election.
Is that why Ham was replaced?
Check the keyword for Benghazi....absolute torrents of articles and statements.
Saw an abbreviated Brett Baer Special Report on the Benghazi coverup ,...attack this morning.
Expect more to be shown tonight and Sunday ...believe at 10 pm EST.
Graphic by LadyJag!
“allegations of inappropriate judgment”
Can we remove the POTUS for the same reason?
maybe connected?
Miramar fighter jets deployed in secret to Mideast
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2951129/posts
No....he was probably screwing the help.
Guys, I have a question. Remember when Obama by-passed Congress using the War Powers Act? And if I’m not mistaken,vhas a limited ‘shelf life’. I seem to remember someone commenting on here that this Operation was given to the CIA because of the WPA as to not get the military involved (as to avoid act of war). Do you thing this is a possibility that the military was told to ‘stand down’?
Wow, like Stalin in 1938.
Gen Ham and Adm. Charles M. Gaouette should be called in front of the Congress. This is getting pretty fishy.
Different from the Gen. Ham situation.
The USS Stinson operates in 5th Fleet and was no where near Libya, which is in North Africa on the Mediterranean where the 6th Fleet operates.
The Adm. was probably removed from duty for some other reason, such as accusations of improper sexual conduct or making some comments about the gays that are now out of the closet.
Time to send the homie in charge back to his homies. He is going to get us all killed.