Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen Daily: SAT 10/27: R:50 O:46 Obama -10%
Rasmussen Reports ^ | 10/27/2012 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 10/27/2012 6:33:08 AM PDT by SoftwareEngineer

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 50% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns the vote from 46%. Two percent (1%) prefer some other candidate, and another two percent (2%) are undecided. This is the fifth consecutive day that Romney has been at the 50% level of support. He has enjoyed a three- or four-point edge on each of those days. See daily tracking history.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; election; obama; rasmussen; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: InterceptPoint

>> Romney doesn’t have leads anything close to 58-42 in the states he is winning <<

I don’t necessarily dispute your point. Maybe the leads aren’t there. I just don’t know, because I haven’t bothered to dig up the latest survey data for each of the eleven states in question. But in my previous post, I just wanted to make the point that it’s not at all difficult to generate a set of numbers replicating Rasmussen’s bottom line.

In any case, if we assume truthfulness and reliability for Rasmussen’s methodology, there clearly has to be SOME combination of swing-state averages that will give Romney a six point advantage.

Therefore, if some energetic FReeper (not me!) has the time to dig thru all the data and run umpteen simulations, I’m pretty confident that he could discover a reasonable scenario to answer your original question, i.e., whether anybody can figure out a way to duplicate Rasmussen’s findings.


61 posted on 10/27/2012 11:37:57 AM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

“....So it ain’t far fetched the female species really DOES take after Eve’s DNA....bunch of stupid idiots!...”

Now you know why the Founding Fathers never let them vote.
It wasn’t because they didn’t love their women. It’s because they knew they would vote their “emotions” rather than the issues. Of course, not all of em are like that in this modern era, but it generally runs true in the mentally-deranged liberal camp for sure.


62 posted on 10/27/2012 1:42:09 PM PDT by lgjhn23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

The problem is dependency on government. Married women are usually conservative. But liberals figured out how to make single women dependent on government by replacing traditional marriage with the acceptance of promiscuity.


63 posted on 10/27/2012 6:35:56 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

“A lot of Conservatives are habitual “Eeyore’s” they assume that they will lose even when they are winning. Leftists live in a emotional bubble world. They figure because they feel something it is true.”

We overanalyze everything. What if this happens, what if that happens?


64 posted on 10/27/2012 10:57:21 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson