Color me stupid, but things still don’t seem to add up.
What was the objective of the attackers?
45 days after the incident and no clear objective appears to be stated.
Terrorism?
In-your-face rebellion to the US?
A thousand Osama bin Ladens in a 9/11 re-enactment?
Kill a homosexual ambassador?
Interrupt ongoing business of the Ambassador?
Eliminate a knowledgeable source?
By direction of others to give Obama an October Surprise?
Kidnap the Ambassador?
Sucker others into the compound, having never been about the Ambassador?
Why attack the Annex 4-6hrs after the Residence?
Seemed to be preplanned fires.
If they attacked it, why didn’t they finish it when the Annex was unsupported by others than the Tripoli reaction team?
Did they confuse the ex-SEAL action as a rescue of the Ambassador, thinking he was now in the Annex, they began an assault on the Annex, only to later find out he was elsewhere, then ceased fire?
Why did they cease fire?
Were the attackers a different hand of a Black Op?
The attackers swing from a handful of elite tacticians to a gaggle of several platoons of pseudo political militant gun toting mobs without leadership. Elements of the attack are premeditated and well equipped. Others are oafish.
*********************************************************
Libya lawmaker says Benghazi attack planned ^
09/16/2012 7:08:53 AM PDT · by navysealdad
**************************************************
taking a break to see what Foxnews , kudlow and o'Reilly have turned up.
factor in manpads and everything adds up.