To: TigersEye
" The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Spectre gunship,..."
Though not directly stating it... does this not actually inform us that there might have been a AC-130 in the area ?
IF ? the security officer HAD a laser on a target ? would it not also mean that there was a AC-130 close by ?
Come on now, what ? the security officer had his or their laser on a target and had to wait 1 hour for the AC-130 to show up and take out the target ?
Ok... the security officer must have thought... " OK, I'll just sit here while I am being shot at and wait for the AC-130 for a hour while I hold this laser on my target " ... SARCASM......
To: American Constitutionalist
I know, I know.
I KNOW!I'm just trying to stay within arm's reach of what has been reported. Don't want anyone selling me any tin foil hats. ;-)
(Aren't the SEALs trained to stand in one spot for hours holding a laser while taking fire without knowing whether anyone is there to strike the target? /s)
158 posted on
10/26/2012 12:19:43 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson