Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Hound Passer

Nate Silver correctly predicted 49 of 50 states’ numbers accurately in 2008 — a record unmatched by any other polling outfit.

Why would he jeopardize his lucrative livelihood by putting out false polls this time around?


21 posted on 10/26/2012 8:31:55 AM PDT by Blue Ink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Blue Ink

“Why would he jeopardize his lucrative livelihood by putting out false polls this time around?”

Why not? It didn’t stop Zogby after his accurate results of 1996. When you let your bias affect your polling methods it hurts your reputation eventually. Plus Silver’s results were by getting inside info from the Obama campaign pollsters.


24 posted on 10/26/2012 8:52:01 AM PDT by princeofdarkness ( Nobama. No more. No way. November 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Ink

Nate Silver is the Dick Morris of the Left. A lot of pollsters are right ONCE, just like a broken clock is right twice a day. Recall Zogby in 2004 and then never again.

I don’t think Nate Silver is intentionally putting up false data, he’s just interpreting it wrong because reality of the tighter race not what he wants to believe...same as Dick Morris wants to believe Romney is going to take PA.


25 posted on 10/26/2012 12:58:17 PM PDT by The Hound Passer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson