I think you are on to something here. I have no idea if a Romney administration gets that or understands the methods to get rid of those infesting our government.
Here's an example of what needs to be done. I think all on FR would agree that the EPA needs to go. The EPA is a poster child of liberalism, anti-business and thoughtless regulation. The government reform that is required needs to be framed with phrases, such as, "stream lining", "efficiency" and "better protecting our environment for our children's future." The key word missing is "business", wink, wink. What needs to be done is to take two or more agencies, such as Interior and EPA, plus offices and bureaus that have functions loosely related to the environment and consolidate them. The streamlining means redundant functions are eliminated through merger into a single department, let's call that the Department of Interior. Of course efficiencies can be achieved if the Department of Interior is relocated to an area that is close to real environmental concerns. Fairbanks, AK comes to mind. Now let's see how many liberals will give up Washington, DC for -40 degree winters that last 8 months.
The same things can be done with other departments. HUD could be relocated to Sioux City. Commerce moved to Provo. Ag moved to Huntsville. HHS moved to Livingston, MT. And so on.
I like it. But I think HUD needs to move to South Central Lost Angeles - to revitalize the area, you know.